Brand errors on mobile: Poor design and optimisation hamper customer experience
Brands are making basic mistakes on mobile that could be costing them money, according to a new study from strategic multichannel consultancy Practicology and UX testing provider WhatUsersDo.
The report is the second joint Mobile Usability Report from the duo and follows UX testing of the mobile sites of 15 UK retailers that included Amazon UK, AO.com, Argos, B&Q, Boohoo, Boots, Debenhams, House of Fraser, Littlewoods, Paperchase, Pets At Home, River Island, Schuh, Sports Direct and Tesco Direct.
The study found basic mistakes around download capabilities, optimisation and poor design that could leave users with a bad experience that retailers can ill afford. Optimisation problems included promotional content on Paperchase that was not optimised for mobile screen sizes whilst certain pages on AO.com, Pets at Home, Argos and Debenhams weren’t optimised for mobile devices at all, according to the report.
Download problems were encountered at B&Q whose homepage menu stuck permanently for a number of the users in the testing and on Debenhams where not all of the users were able to download the department store’s app when prompted by an overlay.
Indeed, the testing showed that three quarters of the sites tested were slow to load which did little to inspire confidence in the brand – instead leading users to think there may be other faults on the sites.
There were also challenges with specific features with users on the Boohoo, River Island and Littlewoods sites hitting problems completing forms at checkout and a failure to scroll past maps on the store locator results pages for a number of sites since the maps moved when touched.
The report showed that new features were emerging however with the ability to provide store stock availability information a welcome feature on mobile product details pages. Easy to find contact and returns information was also deemed useful by the users.
Nupur Manchanda, Practicology’s COO, said the report showed that meeting customers’ expectations on mobile was now more important than ever. “The findings highlight that users’ expectations of how easy mobile sites should be to use have moved on since Practicology and WhatUsersDo published its first Mobile Usability Report in April 2014,” she said.
“In particular, users often blamed themselves or their devices for a poor experience 18 months ago, but now they very much believe that it is an issue for retailers to resolve,” she added. Lee Duddell, founder of WhatUsersDo said: “The report shows that most retailers still have some way to go to maximise mobile revenue.”
- » IT versus marketing: Why blame culture is causing retailers’ budgets to go down the drain
- » Look to the cloud as the silver lining for CX and fast fashion’s global growth
- » Gartner’s latest report reveals the top three barriers to marketing innovation
- » Starbucks flips the equation with Deep Brew – by using AI for a more humanised customer experience
- » Eight ways to make potential customers feel safer browsing your site